Lol it's really not a big deal, come on.
Oh these are nice. These are really nice. I like these updates a lot.
Thank you! This is great.
thanks for the updates keep up the good work :)
Necro bumps are fun sometimes, and there's nothing to actually gain from locking old threads.
If you mean automatically locking old threads, sure, it's hard to tell how long is "long enough". Plus some threads are worth reviving, so maybe automatic locking isn't necessary.
However, sometimes a thread is done and people go and post stupid stuff on it after the fact and mess up the original content. In these cases, I think it's important to close them so people know that "it's finished".
Can creators of threads close their threads? That'd make a lot of sense, but I can't seem to find the feature if it exists.
Auto-locking seems a little pointless to me. The whole point of it is so that a forgotten article no longer bothers OP with notifications. If OP were so worried about it, they could lock the article themselves either after they get their answer, or when they get a response after the thread's death that reminds them to close it.
Also, auto-closing too early (an unlikely circumstance, but it could happen) leads to unnecessary complications (especially if it is irreversible).
Also, maybe thread closing can be based on democracy? Just a thought I had.
I don't want users to be able to close their own threads; sorry. I'm probably not going to do auto locking either. Threads can already be reopened by staff btw.
Unless we had a REALLY good algorithm, auto-locking would turn us into GameFAQs probably. There isn't a single active thread on the SB board over there.