Feature Requests [OLD]

Make high compatibility mode the default please? I'm using it for everything as well as this as my custom CSS:

body {
  background-image: none !important;
  width: 800px;
  margin: 0 auto;
}

The rumored "new website" will be closer to highcompat by default (and possibly fix some lingering layout ugliness). Hand-waving aside, you haven't made it clear what about high compatibility mode you need, nor whether you actually expect this to apply to everyone or just be the default under your account.

High compat has much faster loading times as well as looking prettier. I find the default layout very clunky and spread over a large area. At least for my large screen size. It looks great on 800px or so screen but on larger monitors it looks way too spread apart.

The UI size option might help a little.

make it so in chat you can see who has ignored you

make it so in chat you can see who has ignored you

no

make it so in chat you can see who has ignored you

no

why not?

make it so in chat you can see who has ignored you

no

why not?

To protect the identity of those who don't want to listen to another? To prevent conflict? Because ignoring someone is a silent and reasonable thing that shouldn't have to be announced?

make it so in chat you can see who has ignored you

no

why not?

To protect the identity of those who don't want to listen to another? To prevent conflict? Because ignoring someone is a silent and reasonable thing that shouldn't have to be announced?

i can disprove these 1. what does that mean it's only a valid argument if someone else can undertstand it 2. how would this feature cause conflict? 3. i don't have a reason but this is not true

make it so in chat you can see who has ignored you

no

why not?

To protect the identity of those who don't want to listen to another? To prevent conflict? Because ignoring someone is a silent and reasonable thing that shouldn't have to be announced?

i can disprove these 1. what does that mean it's only a valid argument if someone else can undertstand it 2. how would this feature cause conflict? 3. i don't have a reason but this is not true

1. I understand it. Debunked. 2. "Are you ingnoring meeeee? Yru doing that?" In fact you've not shut up with me over the idea I've possibly been ignoring you. Debunked.

make it so in chat you can see who has ignored you

no

why not?

To protect the identity of those who don't want to listen to another? To prevent conflict? Because ignoring someone is a silent and reasonable thing that shouldn't have to be announced?

i can disprove these 1. what does that mean it's only a valid argument if someone else can undertstand it 2. how would this feature cause conflict? 3. i don't have a reason but this is not true

1. I understand it. Debunked. 2. "Are you ingnoring meeeee? Yru doing that?" In fact you've not shut up with me over the idea I've possibly been ignoring you. Debunked.

2. i don't see how anyone would say that. in fact the only way it could happen is if it WASN'T a feature lol also you don't debunk a disprove. you debunk a theory.

make it so in chat you can see who has ignored you

no

why not?

To protect the identity of those who don't want to listen to another? To prevent conflict? Because ignoring someone is a silent and reasonable thing that shouldn't have to be announced?

i can disprove these 1. what does that mean it's only a valid argument if someone else can undertstand it 2. how would this feature cause conflict? 3. i don't have a reason but this is not true

1. I understand it. Debunked. 2. "Are you ingnoring meeeee? Yru doing that?" In fact you've not shut up with me over the idea I've possibly been ignoring you. Debunked.

2. i still don't see how anyone would say that. in fact the only way it could happen is if it WASN'T a feature lol also you don't debunk a disprove. you debunk a theory.

If you saw someone was ignoring you in real life you’d probably be mad. Same applies in chat, seeing who doesn’t want to talk to you would definitely cause conflict. Knowing people don’t want to talk you is upsetting, so why would we let you know when some was ignoring you.

make it so in chat you can see who has ignored you

no

why not?

To protect the identity of those who don't want to listen to another? To prevent conflict? Because ignoring someone is a silent and reasonable thing that shouldn't have to be announced?

i can disprove these 1. what does that mean it's only a valid argument if someone else can undertstand it 2. how would this feature cause conflict? 3. i don't have a reason but this is not true

1. I understand it. Debunked. 2. "Are you ingnoring meeeee? Yru doing that?" In fact you've not shut up with me over the idea I've possibly been ignoring you. Debunked.

2. i still don't see how anyone would say that. in fact the only way it could happen is if it WASN'T a feature lol also you don't debunk a disprove. you debunk a theory.

If you saw someone was ignoring you in real life you’d probably be mad. Same applies in chat, seeing who doesn’t want to talk to you would definitely cause conflict. Knowing people don’t want to talk you is upsetting, so why would we let you know when some was ignoring you.

but still the first example of are you ignoring me would only happen if it wasn't a feature.

1. Let us propose a situation wherein individual A has decided to ignore individual B. The reasoning does not matter. Does individual A have a right to keep that decision to themselves? Absolutely. Whether someone has ignored you or not is about you, not them, until such time as they make it about themselves (e.g. by proclaiming to everyone "I HAVE IGNORED USER B"). Even doing this doesn't make the decision to ignore less valid or inappropriate. 2. I'm not sure that I should have to defend this but users that view being ignored as an insult tend to then attempt to argue against the perceived insult to themselves. 3. I believe that you may fall into the category that I described above.

If this were added (which would never happen), someone could just write their own ignoring script that doesn't notify the other person.

If this were added (which would never happen), someone could just write their own ignoring script that doesn't notify the other person.

The original request was for a way to query the server for the list.

More programs on the front page? Maybe a section where i someone else did stuff like sprites? ya know? Did I miss something?

More programs on the front page? Maybe a section where i someone else did stuff like sprites? ya know? Did I miss something?

Maybe a "Mystery Program of the week" that chooses a random program that's not popular and not downvoted to heck, just in the middle. It would show people programs they didn't even know existed and would encourage rating the program.

Make an app for android and IOS

An app (Maybe lol? dont expect it though. It takes a lot of time to make)

Make an app for android and IOS

Exists. This thread is supposed to be for actual missing features that could improve the website. I have never seen having an app properly defended. Demonstrated in https://smilebasicsource.com/forum?ftid=747

An app (Maybe lol? dont expect it though. It takes a lot of time to make)

Make an app for android and IOS

Exists. This thread is supposed to be for actual missing features that could improve the website. I have never seen having an app properly defended. Demonstrated in https://smilebasicsource.com/forum?ftid=747

Oh, sorry Also if i click on that link it shows me some firefoxes on Google Play and Play Store

An app (Maybe lol? dont expect it though. It takes a lot of time to make)

Make an app for android and IOS

Exists. This thread is supposed to be for actual missing features that could improve the website. I have never seen having an app properly defended. Demonstrated in https://smilebasicsource.com/forum?ftid=747

Oh, sorry Also if i click on that link it shows me some firefoxes on Google Play and Play Store

They were being sarcastic. ;P