LoginLogin

Feature Requests [OLD]

Root / Site Discussion / [.]

🔒
NeatNitCreated:
Bold, italics, underline, strikethroughs in the chat maybe
No.
Yes

Bold, italics, underline, strikethroughs in the chat maybe
No.
Yes

Bold, italics, underline, strikethroughs in the chat maybe
No.
No

Change settings in autolinker: -disable linking of phone numbers -disable removal of http:// and www. -disable linking of twitter names

Change settings in autolinker: -disable linking of phone numbers -disable removal of http:// and www. -disable linking of twitter names
*Tries to upvote*

*Tries to upvote*
*Tries to upvote*

*Tries to upvote*
*Tries to upvote*
*Tries to upvote*

Change settings in autolinker: -disable linking of phone numbers -disable removal of http:// and www. -disable linking of twitter names
Do the that, except twitter names thats cool sometimes

Change settings in autolinker:
Do the that, except twitter names thats cool sometimes
And here we see someone who has never posted SmileBASIC code into chat in their life.

Change settings in autolinker:
Do the that, except twitter names thats cool sometimes
And here we see someone who has never posted SmileBASIC code into chat in their life.
Keklolkej

Change settings in autolinker:
Do the that, except twitter names thats cool sometimes
And here we see someone who has never posted SmileBASIC code into chat in their life.
/code and it's not linked

There's also the fact that people use @username to respond to people in chat, and no one has the same username on twitter so it just links to some random person's profile.

There's also the fact that people use @username to respond to people in chat, and no one has the same username on twitter so it just links to some random person's profile.
I say we don't link but still highlight it.

There's also the fact that people use @username to respond to people in chat, and no one has the same username on twitter so it just links to some random person's profile.
I say we don't link but still highlight it.
I agree with this lol. I like the highlighting

There's also the fact that people use @username to respond to people in chat, and no one has the same username on twitter so it just links to some random person's profile.
I say we don't link but still highlight it.
I agree with this lol. I like the highlighting
Done or something

There's also the fact that people use @username to respond to people in chat, and no one has the same username on twitter so it just links to some random person's profile.
I say we don't link but still highlight it.
I agree with this lol. I like the highlighting
Done or something
So it now does the ?username function and links to the user on sbs.

Change settings in autolinker:
Do the that, except twitter names thats cool sometimes
And here we see someone who has never posted SmileBASIC code into chat in their life.
/code and it's not linked
"Haha owned!"

I want a way to watch a specific user. If Lumage posted something that didn't gain a lot of momentum (i.e. didn't get into the popular posts section on the home page), then almost no one would know about what they said unless someone "upvoted" it to the popular posts. I think that's a pain in the butt. If someone was following Lumage, they'd know instantly if they posted something important. I think it'll be easier for the admins to spread news, updates, and contests so they don't have to categorize a post as an announcement.

I want a way to watch a specific user. If Lumage posted something that didn't gain a lot of momentum (i.e. didn't get into the popular posts section on the home page), then almost no one would know about what they said unless someone "upvoted" it to the popular posts. I think that's a pain in the butt. If someone was following Lumage, they'd know instantly if they posted something important. I think it'll be easier for the admins to spread news, updates, and contests so they don't have to categorize a post as an announcement.
Bad suggestion. You can just look at their activity. How do we tell if someone's post is important or not? Contests should be categorized anyways, not spread through watching.

I want a way to watch a specific user. If Lumage posted something that didn't gain a lot of momentum (i.e. didn't get into the popular posts section on the home page), then almost no one would know about what they said unless someone "upvoted" it to the popular posts. I think that's a pain in the butt. If someone was following Lumage, they'd know instantly if they posted something important. I think it'll be easier for the admins to spread news, updates, and contests so they don't have to categorize a post as an announcement.
I mean... I should probably... eventually do something like this. It's just hard with the current system.