LoginLogin
Nintendo shutting down 3DS + Wii U online services, see our post

Feature Requests [OLD]

Root / Site Discussion / [.]

🔒
NeatNitCreated:
The search will be entirely redone on the new website. It should be better. Your posts are fine

The search will be entirely redone on the new website. It should be better. Your posts are fine
New website?

The search will be entirely redone on the new website. It should be better.
New website?
Same website, really. New backend, new code. Less difficult to work with.

The search will be entirely redone on the new website. It should be better.
New website?
Same website, really. New backend, new code. Less difficult to work with.
Oh! glad I know about this know!

we should have some sort of like system.

we should have some sort of like system.
DaSonicMario Agrees

we should have some sort of like system.
DaSonicMario Agrees
This has been pitched enough times that I can tell you that the answer is going to be "not happening". There's no reason for it.

we should have some sort of like system.
We have an upvote and downvote system. I can safely say that I enjoy it more than Miiverse's crappy like system, which was infested with Yeahspammers and didn't accurately show controversy or negativity.

we should have some sort of like system.
We have an upvote and downvote system. I can safely say that I enjoy it more than Miiverse's crappy like system, which was infested with Yeahspammers and didn't accurately show controversy or negativity.
i mean on forum posts to support people. but ok.

we should have some sort of like system.
We have an upvote and downvote system. I can safely say that I enjoy it more than Miiverse's crappy like system, which was infested with Yeahspammers and didn't accurately show controversy or negativity.
i mean on forum posts to support people. but ok.
Just quote the post and put a +1.

we should have some sort of like system.
We have an upvote and downvote system. I can safely say that I enjoy it more than Miiverse's crappy like system, which was infested with Yeahspammers and didn't accurately show controversy or negativity.
i mean on forum posts to support people. but ok.
Just quote the post and put a +1.
Or, we could let people do what they want, instead of trying to command what everyone's doing. Let Lumage and the other management decide, if they don't see anything wrong with it why turn it into a problem?
Or we could just give legitimate requests instead of making chitchat.

Both options are pretty unnecessary. If you don't have any actual content to contribute, there's usually no reason to comment. If a measure of agreement is needed, that's what polls are for. Anyway, rumor says the new system will allow answers to questions to be voted on for their quality. This allows good contributions to be rated the way other question/answer systems have, without leading to "+1" or agreement with shitposts.

Both options are pretty unnecessary. If you don't have any actual content to contribute, there's usually no reason to comment. If a measure of agreement is needed, that's what polls are for. Anyway, rumor says the new system will allow answers to questions to be voted on for their quality. This allows good contributions to be rated the way other question/answer systems have, without leading to "+1" or agreement with shitposts.
did not see your post before saying +1

Anyway, rumor says the new system will allow answers to questions to be voted on for their quality. This allows good contributions to be rated the way other question/answer systems have, without leading to "+1" or agreement with shitposts.
Like Quora or Yahoo Answers?

We need a way to delete our own resources and threads, that isnt telling an admin.

We need a way to delete our own resources and threads, that isnt telling an admin.
I think this has already been denied.

We need a way to delete our own resources and threads, that isnt telling an admin.
I think this has already been denied.
It needs to exist though. its only makes sense.

If arguing occurs on threads and one party is the thread maker They can get the last word and close it to "win" Admins don't like this They're stubborn and won't show shows heart to ideas they don't agree with maybe Good luck If you get this change I'll be so happy!!

If arguing occurs on threads and one party is the thread maker They can get the last word and close it to "win" Admins don't like this They're stubborn and won't show shows heart to ideas they don't agree with maybe Good luck If you get this change I'll be so happy!!
Well what if one becomes irrelevant over time or is being replaced, eh? Those are very valid reasons.

We need a way to delete our own resources and threads, that isnt telling an admin.
I think this has already been denied.
It needs to exist though. its only makes sense.
No. People don't need to destroy content. You don't "own" threads, really. Maybe your posts, but threads can be contributed to by other people, and if you delete a thread it says that those other contributions don't matter. It says your contributions don't matter, either, which also isn't something for you to determine.