#1✎ 27TriforceOfKirbyJust something I created in my spare time as a replacement favicon.
Download
Alternative command-line download via curl+tar:
curl 'https://brandon-schumann.github.io/images/smilebasic-source/favicon.tar.xz' | tar xJ
HTML:
<link rel="icon" type="image/svg+xml" sizes="any" href="/favicon.svg">
<link rel="icon" type="image/webp" sizes="192x192" href="/favicon.webp">
<link rel="icon" type="image/png" sizes="192x192" href="/favicon.png">
Browser support information:
SVG: Firefox and Linux desktops.
WebP: Chrome and Opera (experimental support in Firefox and Safari)
PNG: Universal
ICO: Universal (usually only used as a last resort. linked automatically when placed at /favicon.ico; useful for non-HTML pages)
#2✎ 1055randomousOwnerRobotHiddenEaster EggsSecond YearMy account is over 2 years oldWebsiteDrawingI like to draw!HobbiesWill replace; if I don't, just yell at me
Posted
#3✎ 27TriforceOfKirbyTake your time, it’s only a minor change anyways; Just a bit more SmileBASICy.
Posted
#4✎ 1055randomousOwnerRobotHiddenEaster EggsSecond YearMy account is over 2 years oldWebsiteDrawingI like to draw!HobbiesOK it's there. Thank you very much!
Edit: it might take a while for cloudflare to clear their cache. It'll show up sometime.
Posted
Edited
by randomous
#5✎ 150812Me21AdminSyntax HighlighterReceived for creating the code syntax highlighter on SBSOSP Contest 2 WinnerI won the second SmileBASIC Source OSP Contest!Programming ContestSecond YearMy account is over 2 years oldWebsiteI think it would look better if you moved the O and K closer together, and made them bigger. That way there isn't so much empty space at the top and bottom.
Posted
I think it would look better if you moved the O and K closer together, and made them bigger. That way there isn't so much empty space at the top and bottom.
The icon was originally exactly the same font as in SmileBASIC (including letter spacing). Random suggested making each pixel larger while retaining the same position, which is what the icon looks like now.
I’ll try your suggestion and see how it looks.
Posted
#8✎ 1055randomousOwnerRobotHiddenEaster EggsSecond YearMy account is over 2 years oldWebsiteDrawingI like to draw!HobbiesAh it FINALLY propagated. I don't want to change it again right now but feel free to change it
Posted
#9✎ 27TriforceOfKirbySmall issue with the current markup:
<link rel="icon" type="image/x-icon" sizes="16x16 24x24 32x32 48x48 64x64 96x96 128x128 192x192 256x256" href="/favicon.ico">
That ICO doesn’t have all those sizes, just the 192x192; so you’re lying to browsers (lol). I decided to only include the 1 size since browsers can scale images perfectly fine on their own, and having a lot of pre-rendered sizes creates a lot of bulk.
The ICO really doesn’t need to be linked anyways, as /favicon.ico is automatically found as part of the specification , and the majority of browsers prefer a PNG over the old ICO format; only using the ICO format favicon as a last resort.
I’m still messing around with tweaking the sizing and spacing to make it look better at smaller scales.
Posted
#10✎ 177HTV04Intermediate ProgrammerI can make programs, but I still have trouble here and there. Programming StrengthApril Fool's 2017 Contest ParticipantI participated in the SmileBASIC Source April Fool's 2017 Contest!Programming ContestForum ContributorHiddenAchievementsThe bookmark icon on iOS doesn't seem to be changed. Maybe it's just my device, but I don't know.
Posted
Edited
by HTV04
The bookmark icon on iOS doesn't seem to be changed. Maybe it's just my device, but I don't know.
You may have to recreate the bookmark and/or clear the browser cache.
Posted
#12✎ 27TriforceOfKirbyI updated the front post with a new icon:
I think it looks a bit better at small sizes than the previous one.
Posted
Edited
by TriforceOfKirby
#13✎ 1055randomousOwnerRobotHiddenEaster EggsSecond YearMy account is over 2 years oldWebsiteDrawingI like to draw!Hobbies
I updated the front post with a new icon:
I think it looks a bit better at small sizes than the previous one.
But now the OK is off center and it's destroying my soul.
Posted
#14✎ 423MasterR3C0RDHelperReceived for being very helpful around SmileBASIC SourceAchievementsSecond YearMy account is over 2 years oldWebsiteosu! Is Awesome!I love osu!Express Yourself
I updated the front post with a new icon:
I think it looks a bit better at small sizes than the previous one.
But now the OK is off center and it's destroying my soul.
Yeah, the K is hitting the edge while the O is closer to the middle, plz fix
Posted
I updated the front post with a new icon:
I think it looks a bit better at small sizes than the previous one.
But now the OK is off center and it's destroying my soul.
Yeah, the K is hitting the edge while the O is closer to the middle, plz fix
O is exactly as close as K is to the middle. I could move the O and K closer together so that it's not touching the edge.
Posted
#17✎ 150812Me21AdminSyntax HighlighterReceived for creating the code syntax highlighter on SBSOSP Contest 2 WinnerI won the second SmileBASIC Source OSP Contest!Programming ContestSecond YearMy account is over 2 years oldWebsiteKerning
Posted
#19✎ 150812Me21AdminSyntax HighlighterReceived for creating the code syntax highlighter on SBSOSP Contest 2 WinnerI won the second SmileBASIC Source OSP Contest!Programming ContestSecond YearMy account is over 2 years oldWebsiteThe distance between letters (or between letters and other objects) isn't just the distance between the bounding boxes, it depends on the actual shape. If you measure at the corners (for example), the O is actually further away from the edge than the K. You don't have to think of it as making the O off center.
Posted
#20✎ 374chickenOSP Contest 1 Contest ParticipantI participated in the first SmileBASIC Source OSP Contest!Second YearMy account is over 2 years oldWebsiteGood PageHiddenAchievements
just a proof-of-concept; the OK still doesn't pertain too much to SmileBASIC
Posted
just a proof-of-concept; the OK still doesn't pertain too much to SmileBASIC